The argument isn't ended. You're at stage 2. Stage two follows after Stage 1 in which Charmaine curse you.. and if you dare reply she pretends you don't exist.
Stage 3 is where she starts leaving comments on your blog as anonymous saying things along the line of "[..]that's why Charmaine didn't respond to you, you don't deserve a response."
Now you see why I'm going on and on..
The reason you replied, the reason I replied to her is so we can some how come to an agreement. Whether we sort out or differences or agree to disagree it doesn't matter.. But when you leave a reply then the arrogant cunt tells herself Ruel isn't worth replying to.. you just might end up doing what I did.
I might have to talk about her family next so I have her attention.
"How dare Ruel respond to Charmaine. He doesn't deserve to be spoken to by the great Charmaine. The only argument that is acceptable is Charmaine's argument.
Besides.. how can she reply. She has to save face in the shit drips world. However.. she can walk around the place bitching and criticising books and we all supposed to take it in the ass."
(I could imagine this comment as well as the last one has a million typos. But since when that is ever my problem...)
I don't think you should resort to her family... Charmaine has made a serious mistake (or series thereof) but engaging in a protracted argument for argument's sake doesn't make sense, particularly when there are better, more profound, issues you can be focusing your writing on. By the way, are you off of Facebook?
3 comments:
Don't be stupid and niave Mr.Johnson.
The argument isn't ended. You're at stage 2. Stage two follows after Stage 1 in which Charmaine curse you.. and if you dare reply she pretends you don't exist.
Stage 3 is where she starts leaving comments on your blog as anonymous saying things along the line of "[..]that's why Charmaine didn't respond to you, you don't deserve a response."
Now you see why I'm going on and on..
The reason you replied, the reason I replied to her is so we can some how come to an agreement. Whether we sort out or differences or agree to disagree it doesn't matter.. But when you leave a reply then the arrogant cunt tells herself Ruel isn't worth replying to.. you just might end up doing what I did.
I might have to talk about her family next so I have her attention.
Lol lol.. *clears throat*
"How dare Ruel respond to Charmaine. He doesn't deserve to be spoken to by the great Charmaine. The only argument that is acceptable is Charmaine's argument.
Besides.. how can she reply. She has to save face in the shit drips world. However.. she can walk around the place bitching and criticising books and we all supposed to take it in the ass."
(I could imagine this comment as well as the last one has a million typos. But since when that is ever my problem...)
I don't think you should resort to her family... Charmaine has made a serious mistake (or series thereof) but engaging in a protracted argument for argument's sake doesn't make sense, particularly when there are better, more profound, issues you can be focusing your writing on. By the way, are you off of Facebook?
Post a Comment